Are sanctuaries an acceptable solution for “excess” wild horses?

By | April 30, 2019
Two members of the wild Equus caballus herd nigh the Simpson ranch inwards the mountains of the Oregon Are sanctuaries an acceptable solution for “excess” wild horses?
Two members of the wild Equus caballus herd nigh the Simpson ranch inwards the mountains of the Oregon-California border. © Laura Simpson

In response to the article past times H. Alan Day, How a rancher saved 1500 wild horses, I offering the inquiry as well as reply; are sanctuaries a sustainable solution for the longstanding dilemma faced past times American wild horses? I shout back not; at best they are a band-aid. Here’s why.
1) Under this so-called ‘proven methodology’ (cited inwards the article), wild horses as well as burros are nonetheless rounded-up as well as families are carve upward up. This lone is argue plenty to state ‘NO’ for people who sympathise wild horses as well as requires that some other alternative for dealing with excess wild horses live undertaken where families are kept together; in that location is such a innovation called ‘Wild Horse Fire Brigade

The excess wild Equus caballus occupation is an obtuse man-created occupation caused past times the unnatural practise of forcing as well as managing wild horses into areas long-ago depleted of the evolved natural predators of wild equids for the purposes of commercial livestock production. Wild horses are literally robbed of the critically of import role of ‘natural selection’ which selects against pitiful genetics naturally every bit it likewise controls the population.

2) ‘Return To Confinement’: this is exactly a draconian thought proffered past times some every bit ‘humane treatment’ of highly intelligent sentient beings. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) camps come upward to hear hither … Wild Horses (and burros) are, later beingness brutally rounded-up, separated from seat unit of measurement as well as endure stress. Stallions are removed from their seat unit of measurement jewels (the all-important genetics), piece mares may live treated with either PZP or GonaCon, which interrupts normal social behaviors inwards seat unit of measurement bands with fifty-fifty to a greater extent than concerning side-effects, according to Dr. Cassandra Nuñez¹.

Two members of the wild Equus caballus herd nigh the Simpson ranch inwards the mountains of the Oregon Are sanctuaries an acceptable solution for “excess” wild horses?
Black as well as his Pb mare Lucy, at Wildhorse Ranch. © Laura Simpson

One perspective of the so-called sanctuaries beingness hastily created is that of large confinement areas that are filled with captured wild horses – the walking-dead. And I state walking-dead because 1 time removed from the wild as well as modified past times human being using drugs as well as other methods to minimize breeding as well as interrupt evolutionary-evolved behavioral ecology as well as social structure, such horses are no longer wild horses. They are destined to walk unopen to these confinements until they die; a distressing testimony to the electrical flow lack of vision past times a handful of people.

An excerpt from a recent article past times Michael Harris (Wildlife Law Program Director at Friends of the Animals) cites the same perspective: “What is ignored past times the pro-PZP community is that wild horses darted with PZP to inhibit their might to naturally reproduce aren’t really, well, “wild” anymore. “Wild,” agency “living inwards a Earth of nature” every bit opposed to beingness “tamed or domesticated” to live to a greater extent than useful to humans. Accordingly, opposition to PZP is based on an ethical belief that wild animals should live complimentary of human manipulation.”

3) Wild horses are critical evolutionary symbionts on the landscape as well as their presence on the landscape every bit grazing large-bodied herbivores greatly benefits the re-seeding of native species plants every bit good every bit reducing excessive wildfire ground-fuel loading, every bit empirically proven at Wild Horse Ranch during the deadly Klamathon Wildfire. Here is a nine-minute lesson inwards the Natural History of native species American wild horses:

4) Even the existence of sanctuaries willing to convey hundreds or thousands of wild horses accommodates the posits of wild animals managers becoming the path of to the lowest degree resistance to extinction. Even though such confinements (‘sanctuaries’) currently offering a solution ameliorate than decease inwards a abattoir or via euthanasia, sanctuaries are far from always beingness unopen to an ideal solution.

5) Sanctuaries toll the world 1 way or another: Subsidized sanctuaries (off-range holding) are exactly some other agency to monetize the ongoing plight of American wild horses as well as the BLM wild Equus caballus mismanagement occupation at the expense of taxpayers. When the BLM is paying landowners (a for-profit model) to warehouse American wild horses, this is zip novel as well as has been done for decades. Non-profit rescues as well as sanctuaries are already hard-pressed to live the daily struggle for donations to pay bills related to their warehousing of wild horses as well as burros.

Two members of the wild Equus caballus herd nigh the Simpson ranch inwards the mountains of the Oregon Are sanctuaries an acceptable solution for “excess” wild horses?
Majestic, 1 of the wild stallions of Wildhorse Ranch. © Laura Simpson

Re-wilding seat unit of measurement bands intact (stallions with harem) into suitable remote wilderness areas makes both ecological as well as economical sense. These genuine wilderness areas volition never live used for livestock production due to costly carry as well as management logistics issues stemming from remote location as well as rugged terrain, coupled with fully functional trophic cascades supporting robust apex predator populations, which inwards such areas would eat-deeply into whatever livestock herds as well as profits.

Re-wilding American wild horses as well as burros into appropriate wilderness areas is, dissimilar whatever sanctuary model, a cash-positive program. Wild horses convey tending of themselves every bit they had for millennia on the landscape (and even as well as then do inwards a few places today) as well as likewise render very valuable wildfire grazing services inwards critical areas, thereby protecting forests, wildlife, habitat, watersheds.

Maybe every bit importantly, the grazing of vegetation as well as resulting scientifically proven reduction of wildfires maintain carbon compounds sequestered inwards soils that would otherwise live volatilized as well as released into the atmosphere every bit hundreds of millions of tons of annual greenhouse gases produced during catastrophic wildfires that give on landscapes with depleted large-bodied plant eater populations. More here.

I say: Lets “Make America Wild Again” (#MAWA) via re-wilding native species American wild horses using Wild Horse Fire Brigade².

Recently I spoke almost this innovation as well as a novel natural history documentary out of Colorado College inwards an Apr 23 TV interview with Perry Atkinson on theDoveTV. Here is that interview.

We tin privy do much ameliorate than management using a render to confinement model. And nosotros owe it to our ain observe as well as integrity to bargain with American wild horses inwards a way befitting of their long-storied service to mankind. Let’s demo a picayune initiatory for a change?



2 The U.S.A. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals inwards California recognized wild horses every bit native species, explaining that BLM “establishes Appropriate Management Levels (“AMLs”) for populations of native species – including wild horses, burros, as well as other wild animals – as well as introduced animals, such every bit livestock.” In Defense of Animals, et al. v. U.S.A. Dept. Interior, et al., No. 12-17804, *6 (9th Cir. May 12, 2014). On Sep 28, 2011 (See Craters AR at 16698. Memorandum Decision & Order) the courtroom addressed “sensitive” species pursuant to BLM’s 2001 Special Status Species Policy. This Policy requires that “sensitive” species live afforded, at a minimum, the same protections every bit candidate species for listing nether the ESA. It called on BLM managers to “obtain as well as utilisation the best available information deemed necessary to evaluate the condition of exceptional condition species inwards areas affected past times Earth utilisation plans …” See Policy at § 6840.22A. Under the Policy, those Earth utilisation plans “shall live sufficiently detailed to seat as well as resolve pregnant Earth utilisation conflicts with exceptional condition species without deferring conflict resolution to implementation-level planning.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *